I keep seeing this image floating around. Does anyone know if it's real or is it A.I.?
Commentaires
DickBigEnough2025-11-22 05:36
Looks like AI but who the fuck knows anymore.
tcglkn2025-11-22 05:37
What about this looks AI?
DickBigEnough2025-11-22 05:39
Just how serene and perfectly posed everyone is. AI makes it impossible to trust shit anymore.
tcglkn2025-11-22 05:43
You know people pose for photos like this right? And they're on set so the likely have a professional there telling them where to stand after they professionally had their makeup done.
DickBigEnough2025-11-22 05:46
Yeah man. I know. I’m saying how good AI is these days makes it impossible to trust something like this as a reliable leak given the context so I’d rather shrug my shoulders and wait and see. Fuck.
SolidPyramid2025-11-22 05:38
[deleted]
DickBigEnough2025-11-22 05:39
Yeah, definitely scary. And already that good, I fear.
deekaydubya2025-11-22 07:25
not this good on its own, maybe with photoshop but still unlikely. There's a lot to pull from this image
MasterTolkien2025-11-22 05:37
If it’s AI, it is impeccable.
arelse2025-11-22 06:16
Look at the chair connections near Patrick Steward’s feet
Sir_Umeboshi2025-11-22 06:19
That's how they are normally. It's so the footrest folds up by its hinge when the chair is folded
clangan5242025-11-22 06:21
It's an X....
*X-Men theme plays*
technobass2025-11-22 07:28
Bun na na na NAA na na!
MajorTurn68902025-11-22 06:22
If you compare it to the one in the back though, I think the chair is just at an angle that makes it look off
idiot-prodigy2025-11-22 09:05
Look at the chair no one is sitting at to the far right.
AI does not usually make two chairs that are from the same lot in different orientation like that, which match in the same image. AI has a tendency to make 3 different chairs, or varying designs.
MattThePl3b2025-11-22 09:16
Not to mention Alan Cumming/ Nightcrawler only has 3 fingers for some reason
/s
SlAM1332025-11-22 05:39
They all have 5 fingers except for Nightcrawler, so I think it might be real.
DickBigEnough2025-11-22 05:40
The hands thing isn’t a reliable tell anymore. Spooky stuff out there.
FlashRx2025-11-22 05:55
Would AI know nightcrawler has fewer fingers?
DickBigEnough2025-11-22 05:57
Maybe. I mean there are images of him all over the internet. I’m not trying to argue it’s absolutely AI. Could be. Could be that it isn’t. Seems pointless to try to tell for sure.
spaceninjaking2025-11-22 06:29
AI doesn’t “know” anything. If the training data included a 3 fingered nightcrawler then it will more likely generate a 3 fingered nightcrawler. Needs a model that’s not too over-trained to generate normal humans, whilst also having specific training images for the character to get it to work, but have seen it done consistently with rather rudimentary SD models and LORAs
HappyBot90002025-11-22 05:56
People seriously need to keep more up to date with what AI is capable of. It's really upsetting how many people still think hands/fingers is a guaranteed tell.
sailorprimus2025-11-22 06:01
I'm sorry to hear you're so upset.
onepostandbye2025-11-22 06:02
Yes, I’m sitting in bed, _upset_ about it.
LADYBIRD_HILL2025-11-22 06:08
It's not guaranteed but it still isn't always accurate, so sometimes it still doesn't get hands right.
HappyBot90002025-11-22 06:09
Sometimes, sure. But *far* less often.
jaythebearded2025-11-22 05:39
I can't stop staring at that damn lamp fuck
ZenithChaser692025-11-22 05:43
Sure you don't have a wife and a kid who are worried about you and aren't experiencing any reality distortion?
Neferpatra2025-11-22 05:53
I understood this reference.
beyondthecircles2025-11-22 06:00
Dang... Back down the rabbit hole I go tonight.
Sufficient_Crab30472025-11-22 06:00
what
Oroshi39652025-11-22 06:14
Boy do we have a story for you
jaythebearded2025-11-22 06:03

palk0n2025-11-22 05:59

TwinJacks2025-11-22 06:43
The lamp makes sense tho. The bottom is wider, so the bounce light on the wall in the lower half (thats closer to the wall) is correctly positioned. Same with the upper bounce light. Its smaller and further away from the wall.. you can try it right now with your phone's flashlight. Put it next to a wall and move it away. The bounce light will go up and out.
chuk20152025-11-22 10:31

Rinzlerx2025-11-22 14:39
Ah a fellow moth.
anilsoi112025-11-22 05:39
Look Nightcrawler only have 3 fingers! /s
A.I.
TheMegaWhopper2025-11-22 05:40
Its not AI
xper00722025-11-22 05:41
I'm inclined to say this isn't AI simply because it got Nightcrawler's fingers correct. AI is notoriously bad at hands and Nightcrawler's hand should have given it extra trouble.
randgan2025-11-22 06:01
There are automated methods to target identifying hands and regenerating just that region to something prompted (like 3 elongated fingers). Or even just manually placing a mask on Nightcrawler's hands and generating just that. Or even just manually photoshopping just that one section of the generated image is warped.
Good hands isn't an automatically easy way to distinguish if an image is AI generated.
BetterBugu2025-11-22 05:42
Pretty sure James Marsden is much taller than Mystique actress, unlike here.
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 05:47
Lol no irl he’s an inch shorter than her and she’s almost certainly wearing some sort of heels.
Marsden is average height, Rebecca Romijn was a model.
BetterBugu2025-11-22 05:55
True! Didn't know that. He just seemed taller in movies than an average guy.
Im_not_creepy32025-11-22 05:48
No Rebecca Romijin is taller than James Marsden, but only by an inch. She's 5'11" and he's 5'10"
JesterMarcus2025-11-22 05:55
That sort of looks like Jennifer Lawrence.
rosmorse2025-11-22 05:58
Nope. I stood right next to him at a party in 2012. He’s tiny.
BetterBugu2025-11-22 06:01
Yeah, by mistake, I think I gave this image a slightly more legitimacy. Though it still might be fake.
Embarrassed_Dingo572025-11-22 05:42
I think James Marsden's leg doesnt look right either. I think AI.
Datelesstuba2025-11-22 05:51
What you’re seeing is the pocket on Patrick Stewart’s chair in front of Marsden’s leg.
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 05:57
That’s also just an empty boot in front of him
Embarrassed_Dingo572025-11-22 06:01
Guess I've caught the ol' AI paranoia
beyondthecircles2025-11-22 06:04
It's not AI
spidervenom6192025-11-22 05:42
It's A.I, Monica's hair isn't that perfect looking and way too fluffy and plus she's seems a slight bit shorter then she was in the Marvels. It's like the A.I can't never seems to get black Woman's Hair right lol. She's always when you can tell if's it's fake or not.
tcglkn2025-11-22 05:45
You think it's AI cause she looks different standing next to different people and just had her hair done by professionals?
spidervenom6192025-11-22 05:52
It's not just her hair, she's seems much shorter in this picture then she normally does, Plus, this photo would never make it out of Doomsday Shooting at all.
Plus, again her hair as Monica has a unique look to it. These recent Photos has been either too Fluffy or not Fluffy at all. This Photo is close but it's not Perfect.
yungstark222025-11-22 05:50
Channing Tatum is tall though, looks legit, hopefully it is, I liked Jennifer Lawrence as Mysitique
spidervenom6192025-11-22 05:54
Again, I wanted to be real too cause I really like Monica's as a character and wanted her in Doomsday but there are small things in this photo that doesn't added up.
InevitableWeight3142025-11-22 05:46
The exit sign is red instead of green. But maybe theyre just red in America idk
Edit: damn okay. I guess red stands out more
actionfigurebarbecue2025-11-22 05:49
Very often red here, so that's normal.
TraeGrape2025-11-22 05:51
Can confirm they’re red in US.
Peimai2025-11-22 05:51
Yea we use red here.
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 05:51
That actually is normal
BradyPhoenix2025-11-22 06:03
You have *green* exit signs???
Edboy7962025-11-22 05:47
Looks legit, I'm sure AI would have included Night crawlers tail.
I just hope Magneto gets the helmet he had in Days of Future Past, which was more comic accurate
Kindly_Ratio98572025-11-22 07:02
If it was real, shouldn’t nightcrawler not be there at all? I though he filmed all his stuff for doomsday separately from everyone else
GeneJacket2025-11-22 08:27
I believe he said he was alone for most of his stuff, but he almost certainly got a couple of days with everyone on set for strictly dialogue scenes. If I recall correctly, he also talked about having to go to London for costuming/makeup tests in an interview. If it's real, it isn't necessarily from set, it could have been from one of the costume fittings/tests before shooting happened. Even if it's not real, though, it all lines up to what we have seen of the costumes in that leaked production bag image (Mystique especially), so even if it's not 100% accurate, it's as close as we're going to get until production stills or a trailer drops.
tenehemia2025-11-22 13:34
He first said that he was training for a fight scene with Pedro Pascal and all the rumor blogs went wild with "Nightcrawler fighting against Reed Richards!!" then like a week later he said the thing about working alone. I'm pretty sure he just wasn't supposed to say the first thing and got someone from Disney chastising him for the leak, so he went ahead and said the second just to cut off the discussion.
Scholander2025-11-22 05:47
It's not AI. The background is too detailed and clear. You would be able to spot something weird with the makeup stuff on the counter, or the cables on the ground, or something off about the costumes. For a second I thought there was something weird about Cyclops's(?) boot, but I think he's just not wearing them -- the other one is behind Magneto. Pretty sure there's no way this is AI. (Unless some/all the characters themselves are AI but photoshopped onto a real makeup room photo.)
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 05:53
Yea, even the cable piping above the exit sign is good.
The texture of the costuming is also way too consistent,
Cute_Source54172025-11-22 06:03
it ai....
Scholander2025-11-22 06:10
I might buy AI+photoshop, like I said. No way is that background AI generated. And, seriously, I don't think an AI would know to be able to do that kind of detail with those costumes. Those are really good comic-accurate costumes that have not been done on film before, but they still have the textures and consistency of modern MCU costumes. It would really be impressive, if AI.
JabbasPetRancor2025-11-22 05:48
youre crazy if you think this is real
agencsa12025-11-22 05:49
Reverse image says it's a fan image created by AI.
When I ask Gemini, it thinks Storm and Beast are in the image.
f1mxli2025-11-22 06:59
It also thinks Hugh Jackman is in it
The_Celtic_Chemist2025-11-22 07:14
The ability to ask if it's fake is apparently a new feature that was just released. I'm not sure how dependable it is though.
Embarrassed-Back18942025-11-22 06:41
I’ve been using Gemini 3 Pro lately and it’s concerningly good. I used to be wishy washy on if ai would lead to an apocalyptic scenario, but the leaps these models are making is unreal.
At the very least we can no longer trust images or videos. Everyone we see something we have to have an analysis about whether it’s ai - and that’s just today. In 3 years we went from being amazed with the Pope in the puffy jacket (and melting fingers) to a group of redditors not being able to tell if a relatively normal picture is real or not. That’s not even getting into video.
CZTachyonsVN2025-11-22 05:49
Ai notoriously struggles with consistency when it comes to small details. The costumes patterns look fine. Cables make sense. Items on the tables aren't smudgy mess. Etc... but it still could be AI assisted and touched up with Photoshop or similar software.
Ghastion2025-11-22 06:28
People are really behind on what AI can do now. They still think it struggles with things it did a year ago or 6 months ago.
deekaydubya2025-11-22 07:23
Still, this does seem legit
nashty20042025-11-22 07:01
He never left the cave
fistkick182025-11-22 10:22
> Cables make sense.
I don't see Josh Brolin in this picture...?
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 05:50
If it is AI, whoever did it must have went through a hundred revisions to remove any mistakes. It does seem over saturated on the makeup but that could be intentional for filming.
Even the lighting is immaculate. You’re seeing an accurate reflection from the light out of frame in front of them.
The textures of the suits are also consistent, which AI is awful about.
spaceninjaking2025-11-22 06:12
The makeup brushes on the side tables have power cables coming out of the bottom…
JustAGirlWonder2025-11-22 06:15
What?
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 06:16
It doesn’t appear to actually be going into the brush, just on the table and then it’s hard to make out because of the low resolution. That’s probably actually for something like an air brush for the blue folks
ETA: If I had to guess, the brush case that’s laid open (brown) is on top of the cord.
hypoxiate2025-11-22 06:17
It's a book with a bookmark.
Spensir_McLife2025-11-22 06:16
Do you mean the wires on the floor beneath the table? Because studios have those things absolutely everywhere.
hypoxiate2025-11-22 06:16
No they don't. That's a book with a bookmark.
FloppyShellTaco2025-11-22 06:19
No, those are brushes. That’s a roll up brush case full of them. It’s just laid on top of the cord.
hypoxiate2025-11-22 06:29
Hmmm. That makes does make more sense.
idiot-prodigy2025-11-22 09:07
Also, 3 identical director style chairs, with intricate wood patterns, all three match, especially the one to the far right that no one is sitting it.
Usually AI makes mistakes with background images, and has a very difficult time making 3 intricate chairs look correct from different angles.
Spicy_Weissy2025-11-22 12:14

idiot-prodigy2025-11-22 18:43
Haha.
two2teps2025-11-22 18:06
[deleted]
haolee5102025-11-22 10:46
It's AI+some more meticulous editing. It's part of a bunch of pics a user posted to prove how easy it is to make good looking AI fakes nowadays.
Yeah I'm going with AI. There's no way the actual production would print and hang a sign 6 feet up the wall that says "DOOMSDAY - SET - RESHOOTS DAY 3".
Nano Banana Pro is my guess. It's been consistently blowing my mind.
Xythium2025-11-22 11:38
these are way more obviously ai than the main post
haolee5102025-11-22 11:48
Exactly why the main post pic is the one people try to pass as real. But they were all posted by the same source.
Jlx_272025-11-22 16:15
The one with Famke in it is a huge giveaway because her face doesn't look like that anymore....
haolee5102025-11-22 18:02
Also Nightcrawler's face somehow morphed into Beast lol.
G13lol22025-11-22 05:53
If no one has the source, then it's AI
Overall_Affect_27822025-11-22 05:53
Google just came out with the latest Nano Banana AI image generator and it is absolutely insane. I made an image of Homelander and Butcher from the Boys fighting in the Oval Office to make it look like it was the first image from the new season; complete with a Hollywood Reporter Logo and “Exclusive” next to the logo and it’s scary how accurate it was. I cant link the photo but seriously, it’s damn good.
So I tried to replicate this photo. It can’t do it, not like this. I tried extensive prompts like lookup the rumored looks of the actors costumes for doomsday, give Channing Tatum a scar on his left cheek, make James marsden look similar in age to him in the latest show “Paradise” on hulu - it can’t do it. The costumes don’t look like this - you can get somewhat close with Channing and Teyona (make their looks similar to their previous appearances) but the others, especially Alan cumming? No way. It falters hard.
If this is AI I’d love to know the prompt they used because it had to be two paragraphs long and extremely detailed.
I think it’s real.
Embarrassed-Back18942025-11-22 06:45
This post is not an exaggeration. It’s crazy what this new model can do. We are doomed. If not by some rogue agentic ai, then at the very least by the death of truth by not being able to tell if photos or videos or real. Drones trained with models of precise weapons firing? Coming right up. These ai companies are racing full speed ahead developing this stuff without a care in the world about the consequences of it (and our government can’t even understand it, let alone legislate it).
Kindly_Ratio98572025-11-22 07:06
Seriously why are we not talking about this
nashty20042025-11-22 07:01
It’s just Nano Banana Pro, you’re over prompting
Dave13072025-11-22 05:55
I kinda want to say Marvel would NOT let these photos get out so easily, so if they're real i just don't want them to be?
Sklain2025-11-22 05:55
who knows at this point.
we live in the worst timeline
sebastiene_art2025-11-22 06:52
I hate AI but this is such an overly dramatic statement.
Any-Transition952025-11-22 07:30
plus Photoshop fakes existed long before generative AI was a concern.
THEDOCTORandME22025-11-22 05:56
I think the census is AI. But I don't know.
rexepic75672025-11-22 05:57
I think it might be the lost art of photoshop
Oroshi39652025-11-22 06:16
I genuinely think it’s a mix of AI and just old school decent photoshop skills. There were photoshop wizards back in the day guys, imagine the power of AI images doctored by talented photoshop users.
idiot-prodigy2025-11-22 09:01
I do this today. Removing the 6th finger, correcting AI double-eye mistakes, etc.
That said, as a graphic designer by trade I'm leaning more towards legitimate real picture.
Oroshi39652025-11-22 09:06
My question then is where the hell it came from, you’d think if there’s no source it’s certainly AI but I guess someone can just drop something in a large discord server and let it make its way to the more open social medias
idiot-prodigy2025-11-22 09:26
If it is AI, a graphic artist with considerable skill combed over it and corrected any errors.
AnOnlineHandle2025-11-22 16:18
That's how I've always used image gen tools in my workflows, and I'm fairly sure this is fake.
The poses are all overly 'safe' in a way which is easier for AI to do, e.g. no fingers overlapping or hands at odd angles which obscure some fingers (which real photos are full of once you start looking). The composition is very perfect, the expressions just a little lacking in real emotion. The colours all have that 'imitating stock photography' look. The scale and angle of Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen also seem off.
Plus these days the characters with painted skin tend to be covered in dots etc, rather than being filmed in a finished state.
Mystique's right hand also has red finger tips, but her left hand doesn't seem to. Her right middle finger also seems super long.
haolee5102025-11-22 10:44
It's AI. The original source was a post/reply on a LeaksandRumors thread, a user who posted several pics(including the one in the OP) to prove that AI results nowadays are good enough to fool people.
Our only way to tell if something is AI generated is by tiny details like how they sit or how many fingers nightcrawler has.
If Photoshop corrects all of those details, we’ll have 0% to tell whether it’s real or not 😳
morphballganon2025-11-22 07:52
Nightcrawler's fingers might have been retconned to match the comics. Old movies he had a "normal" number, comics he had fewer
bitingbeavers2025-11-22 08:39
He’s had three fingers in comics, cartoons, movies, etc the whole time.
morphballganon2025-11-22 08:50
... huh. I could have sworn the older movies nixed the hand design for simplicity, but all these stills I'm seeing on google agree with you
Johnreel242025-11-22 09:03
Azazel had normal no. of fingers. Maybe thats what messed with your memory.
Samaritan_Pr1me2025-11-22 05:57
Nope.
- I think we all knew that every single one of these characters were in *Doomsday*.
- The fact that Teyonah Paris (Monica Rambeau/Photon) is in this group shot tells me this isn’t AI because AI wouldn’t think to include her. Maybe Ellen Page as Rogue or Famka Jansen as Phoenix, even though the latter has apparently said she’s not in the movie.
- Also, Mystique never wore that outfit in her movies.
- Cyclops never wore that outfit.
- the lighting looks about right for a real photo.
nandovmovies2025-11-22 06:00
It's good AI. I think we heard Alan Cumming say he didn't need to wear makeup.
vivianvisionsburner2025-11-22 06:30
No - it was that the makeup process was a lot shorter lol. From like several hours to just 2 or whatever
Flintstones_VRV_Fan2025-11-22 06:00
This is real. Reflections in the mirror are perfect.
Aromatic-Adagio21212025-11-22 06:01
It's AI. Google AI generation has gotten ridiculously good. Someone made a couple of The Boys stills that looked very convincing until the author said they were made in AI.
Also there's more of those X-Men pics going around where they change it so their backs are to the camera or there's one with Famke there as Jean and Nicholas Hoult as Beast.
Cute_Source54172025-11-22 06:03
someone on another sub admitted to making this...bruh its AI
CommaderInChiefs2025-11-22 06:03
Yes its AI
Vice4Life2025-11-22 06:05
I've been on the fence about this one for a bit too. I'm currently leaning toward it being real. My reason for this is because my current favorite verification game is "Where's the light source?" In this case, my reason for believing it's real are the vanity lights stage right. First, the change in warmth is evident on the side of Patrick Steward and James Marsden's heads and shiny bits. It's also correctly reflecting the color in Rebecca Romjin's hair. The last and most important bit is on Patrick Stewards right shoe. If you look closely, the circular lights are correctly reflected, even lights that aren't in the actual image. As an aside, all the standing actor's heights properly match one another, accounting for Alan Cumming leaning forward.
If it's fake, I'm done looking at AI pics to determine their authenticity. I can't do it anymore. They've won.
Edit: Disregard all of my nonsense. I'm almost certain it's fake. What Nano Banana does is absurd. I'm going to post a comment with an image I generated in about an hour that if I spent more time on prompting could be identical.
Vice4Life2025-11-22 08:35
My [generated](https://ibb.co/xSfcy6y1) image.
shieldwolf2025-11-22 14:30
This is good but has some tells. Nightcrawler does not look like Alan Cumming. His hands and forearms look weird makeup wise. It’s good but not as good as the original.
theredditman9992025-11-22 06:07
You can tell its AI based off of some of the faces
StarlightStarchild2025-11-22 06:08
Tough one. Someone could have promoted ai over and over again until it looked good and manually lowered the picture quality.
Yoshimon72025-11-22 06:09
Ai Channing tatum doesn’t look that good looking anymore…
SREnrique222025-11-22 06:09
It's not AI. For all reasons everyone already listed, but also because there's other pictures around with some of these people, and they are all consistent, both costumes and make up. This is legit.
BleakCountry2025-11-22 06:10
It's fake/AI. Alan Cumming has mentioned that he didn't film any scenes with his co-stars
theodo2025-11-22 06:10
A mod in the Leaks sub just took it down saying definitively it's fake. To me, the most impressive thing is that if it's fake, the person made the inexplicable choice of including Teyonah Parris, who has no relation to the FoXmen, and no one cares about her costume/appearance in the film.
Scholander2025-11-22 06:22
Uh.. at the end of Marvels, Teyonah's character ended up in a universe with a Kelsey Grammer Beast. So, she has every reason to be with a version of Fox X-Men.
theodo2025-11-22 06:25
Okay that's a good point, I forgot about the post credits from The Marvels. Now yeah I could see it being Ai
SeniorBridge40962025-11-22 06:11
my gut feeling says it's AI
proficient2ndplacer2025-11-22 06:12
New version of Gemini dropped recently, bunch of AI fakes for The Boys season 5 fooled the sub today. It's getting shockingly good and I strongly suspect this is generated with the new Gemini as well
Lazy_Osprey2025-11-22 06:13
The random lamp makes me think it’s ai.
reddit_hayden2025-11-22 06:15
if it is AI, it’s very good.
tyderian2025-11-22 06:15
Yes, someone probably knows whether it's real or AI.
driku122025-11-22 06:15
Every single object on the table is consistent and has correct perspective and isn't bleeding into each other. It's probably real and it's beautiful.
deekaydubya2025-11-22 07:25
specificity of the costumes, and the actors' ages too. Could be photoshop but idk man
MatthewMonster2025-11-22 06:16
It’s fake af
If it was real reddit and other sites would be getting copyright strikes
taylorhildebrand2025-11-22 06:21
To me this picture makes perfect sense. It’s everyone I’d expect, they’d all be there for the same days of shooting, and they’d definitely have those 2 oldies sitting down haha they’ve also aged exactly as they have in real life
nashty20042025-11-22 06:21
Nano Banana Pro fools
ElBorracho20002025-11-22 06:22
I seriously hate how far along AI has gotten
Dbonker2025-11-22 06:23
All I know is that were getting closer to the trailer!!! ALL ABOARD THE HYPE TRAIN!!!
Gorilla_Gru2025-11-22 06:25
AI has come way to far if its AI
vivianvisionsburner2025-11-22 06:25
The hands all look awfully normal
Even depth of field and the costume details seem legit
I think it's probably real tbh
Logical-Charity-95212025-11-22 06:31
Why is this the internet now? Is this AI? Is this real? Its all gonna be fake from here on out fellas the pics the short vids the porn all of it...
OnlyHuman29962025-11-22 06:32
It's scary how close to realism AI has come... but my honest opinion? I think this is real. I saw another pic with Channing Tatum and Lashana Lynch, and it looked very similar, with the cut on Gambit's face.
Ube_Ape2025-11-22 06:32
There are ton of these, one with James and Channing smiling in a mirror selfie too that have been debunked on Twitter but I will say these AI photos are getting really impressive.
_dontjimthecamera2025-11-22 06:35
Nightcrawler looks fucking incredible regardless of AI or not
AaronTheLudwig2025-11-22 06:40
Real, in my opinion. Haven't seen any convincing arguments for it being false. Given that it's not being taken down like crazy, it's likely an intentional leak on Marvel's part.
Positive-Many-53902025-11-22 06:43
The fact everything that’s seen now… the AI question pops up… that’s crazy bro
RevTen2025-11-22 06:44
Patrick Stewart has laces on one shoe but not the other. probably AI
BatDubb2025-11-22 06:47
It’s AI. Look at Nightcrawler’s fingers.
Bassballr2_02025-11-22 06:50
They are all confirmed actors looks a little smooth so pic might be fake but isn’t leaking any info
PyroClone55552025-11-22 06:50
Pretty sure it’s fake and based off the crew bag designs. There was another image of Cyclops and Monica with the same costumes as this that had the watermark of the AI that was used
Apprehensive_Fig80872025-11-22 06:50
You can tell it's real by all the fucking unnecessary lines on all the costumes.
Also Nightcrawler and Mystique are surprisingly wrapped up compaired to their previous outtings, to save time and money on the make up process.
Also also, all the actors like their current age.
jdyake2025-11-22 06:53
Google says that James Marsden and Alan Cumming are the same height. Unless that’s incorrect then this is a good fake
GraconBease2025-11-22 06:53
I still remember the No Way Home deniers!! This is real and may I say that they all look fabulous
demerchmichael2025-11-22 07:02
I think there’s way too much going on in the background to be Ai
even tho we’ve come a long way with Ai, Ai still hasn’t gotten that good with background details.
MaxReb02025-11-22 07:02
Everybody here talking about AI. I’m just fixated on suddenly remembering Monica is in an X-Men universe
HereForGoodReddit2025-11-22 07:03
I don’t give a fuck either way—this shit has me hyped as hell
DJettster2372025-11-22 07:14
AI with Photoshop is powerful.
McGruffTheBadger2025-11-22 07:14
Google AI tells me Marsden’s right hand, Rebecca’s right hand on his shoulder, and Patrick’s left hand (as well as Channing’s right hand) are all sus. I argued with it for awhile, but Marsden and RR’s right hands do seem a little…off
PepperMintGumboDrop2025-11-22 07:15
This make sense since Monica was dropped into the X-men universe at the end of the Marvels.
Erra1152025-11-22 07:15
It’s insane how many people are saying this isn’t AI. Damn we really are in that timeline now
Gashuffer132025-11-22 07:18
I wanna say it's real. Gambits updated suit is exactly what marvel would design. If it was AI I would believe that his suit would have been the same as it was in Deadpool. I know AI is good now but that I just feel this might be real. If not oh well but I have 0 complaints of what I'm seeing if it is real. That cyclops suit.... perfection.
wingusdingus20002025-11-22 07:21
AI
Imonty112025-11-22 07:23
This is definitely legit
pirategavin2025-11-22 07:26
James’ right pinkie finger is all wonky.
Is it wonky IRL?
This could be the decider, folks.
RowdyEast2025-11-22 07:29
That's not real, trust your brain
The--Incident2025-11-22 07:36
Didn’t Cumming say he shot his parts all by himself?
616ThatGuy2025-11-22 07:37
I’ve been zooming in all over. If it’s a fake, it’s a damn good one. It looks real. But who knows these days. If someone was really inclined they could have used Ai then photoshopped out the typical Ai mistakes.
AsterArtworks2025-11-22 07:42
looks fake to me, only costumes that look good are the ones we've already seen.
Substantial_Life47732025-11-22 07:43
The one ai checker I used says it’s not. But I have no idea how good it is at knowing
Spleenzorio2025-11-22 07:45
It’s fake. There’s a second one that goes along with this one that has James Marsden, Teyonah Parris and Channing Tatum taking a photo of their reflection in a mirror using what looks like an iPhone 17, but you can see that the iPhone’s camera layout isn’t accurate at all.
akaynaveed2025-11-22 07:51
Feige released it himself to throw you off.
shadowst172025-11-22 13:54
We know that Alan Cumming did his filming by himself and the odds of this photo getting leaked intentionally by someone on the crew are very low less they're an idiot.
Commentaires
*X-Men theme plays*
AI does not usually make two chairs that are from the same lot in different orientation like that, which match in the same image. AI has a tendency to make 3 different chairs, or varying designs.
/s
A.I.
Good hands isn't an automatically easy way to distinguish if an image is AI generated.
Marsden is average height, Rebecca Romijn was a model.
Plus, again her hair as Monica has a unique look to it. These recent Photos has been either too Fluffy or not Fluffy at all. This Photo is close but it's not Perfect.
Edit: damn okay. I guess red stands out more
I just hope Magneto gets the helmet he had in Days of Future Past, which was more comic accurate
The texture of the costuming is also way too consistent,
At the very least we can no longer trust images or videos. Everyone we see something we have to have an analysis about whether it’s ai - and that’s just today. In 3 years we went from being amazed with the Pope in the puffy jacket (and melting fingers) to a group of redditors not being able to tell if a relatively normal picture is real or not. That’s not even getting into video.
I don't see Josh Brolin in this picture...?
Even the lighting is immaculate. You’re seeing an accurate reflection from the light out of frame in front of them.
The textures of the suits are also consistent, which AI is awful about.
ETA: If I had to guess, the brush case that’s laid open (brown) is on top of the cord.
Usually AI makes mistakes with background images, and has a very difficult time making 3 intricate chairs look correct from different angles.
Here's the other pics they posted
[https://imgur.com/a/UNv6wuP](https://imgur.com/a/UNv6wuP)
Nano Banana Pro is my guess. It's been consistently blowing my mind.
So I tried to replicate this photo. It can’t do it, not like this. I tried extensive prompts like lookup the rumored looks of the actors costumes for doomsday, give Channing Tatum a scar on his left cheek, make James marsden look similar in age to him in the latest show “Paradise” on hulu - it can’t do it. The costumes don’t look like this - you can get somewhat close with Channing and Teyona (make their looks similar to their previous appearances) but the others, especially Alan cumming? No way. It falters hard.
If this is AI I’d love to know the prompt they used because it had to be two paragraphs long and extremely detailed.
I think it’s real.
we live in the worst timeline
That said, as a graphic designer by trade I'm leaning more towards legitimate real picture.
The poses are all overly 'safe' in a way which is easier for AI to do, e.g. no fingers overlapping or hands at odd angles which obscure some fingers (which real photos are full of once you start looking). The composition is very perfect, the expressions just a little lacking in real emotion. The colours all have that 'imitating stock photography' look. The scale and angle of Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen also seem off.
Plus these days the characters with painted skin tend to be covered in dots etc, rather than being filmed in a finished state.
Mystique's right hand also has red finger tips, but her left hand doesn't seem to. Her right middle finger also seems super long.
Here are the other images they posted:
[https://imgur.com/a/UNv6wuP](https://imgur.com/a/UNv6wuP)
If Photoshop corrects all of those details, we’ll have 0% to tell whether it’s real or not 😳
- I think we all knew that every single one of these characters were in *Doomsday*.
- The fact that Teyonah Paris (Monica Rambeau/Photon) is in this group shot tells me this isn’t AI because AI wouldn’t think to include her. Maybe Ellen Page as Rogue or Famka Jansen as Phoenix, even though the latter has apparently said she’s not in the movie.
- Also, Mystique never wore that outfit in her movies.
- Cyclops never wore that outfit.
- the lighting looks about right for a real photo.
Also there's more of those X-Men pics going around where they change it so their backs are to the camera or there's one with Famke there as Jean and Nicholas Hoult as Beast.
If it's fake, I'm done looking at AI pics to determine their authenticity. I can't do it anymore. They've won.
Edit: Disregard all of my nonsense. I'm almost certain it's fake. What Nano Banana does is absurd. I'm going to post a comment with an image I generated in about an hour that if I spent more time on prompting could be identical.
If it was real reddit and other sites would be getting copyright strikes
Even depth of field and the costume details seem legit
I think it's probably real tbh
Also Nightcrawler and Mystique are surprisingly wrapped up compaired to their previous outtings, to save time and money on the make up process.
Also also, all the actors like their current age.
even tho we’ve come a long way with Ai, Ai still hasn’t gotten that good with background details.
Is it wonky IRL?
This could be the decider, folks.